A matrix management organization allows employees to report to several managers. Some businesses use matrix management to streamline their operations. While this type of organization may not be for everyone, it is critical to grasp its benefits and application in order to assess if it is the best fit for you and the firm for which you work. In this post, we will explore matrix management structure, its benefits, and drawbacks, as well as how to best implement it in your workplace.
What is Matrix Management?
Matrix management is the organizational structure used by businesses to distribute employee duties and have them report to numerous supervisors. The project manager and the functional manager are the two basic chains of command in matrix management.
Because of the numerous matrix management styles, it’s crucial to grasp what they’re trying to achieve in order to assess if this type of management is right for you and your firm.
Types of Matrix Management
Matrix management styles can be divided into three categories:
#1. Weak Matrix
The project manager has little authority in these matrix systems. This could imply that they are not being reported. Power shifts to the functional manager in a weak matrix, while project managers take on more of a project coordinator role.
#2. Balanced Matrix
Project managers and functional managers have equal authority and power in a balanced matrix. Project managers identify the capabilities required for a project, and functional managers allocate personnel to match those needs. Members of the team keep both managers up to date on their progress and priorities.
#3. Strong Matrix
Project managers have the most authority in a strong matrix, and team members report to them. This implies that project managers must also divide resources and provide responsibilities to each team member. A powerful matrix often has one professional with the most influence over a project, allowing team members to direct their communication to this single management.
Responsibilities and Roles in a Matrix Management Structure
Although a matrix management structure has various functions, the following are the most important ones.
#1. Matrix Employees
Individual contributors in a matrix-based organization are referred to as matrix employees. As previously said, matrix employees and their skill sets are used by multiple departments to carry out various projects. As a result, they must report to their functional manager as well as their line managers. It is also required that they enhance their skill set on a regular basis and remain relevant to their current function in order to be easily deployed in other initiatives.
#2. Functional Managers
Functional managers (another word for project managers) are in charge of a certain function or project. They will require various types of resources to perform their delivery obligations throughout the project’s life cycle. As a result, they periodically contact the corresponding resource managers to onboard or discharge practitioners. Once resources are assigned to a functional unit, it is the functional manager’s role to oversee their day-to-day operations. While deployed in that project, the resources have a dotted reporting line to the functional manager.
#3. Line Managers
Within the matrix organization, every resource reports directly to a line manager or departmental manager. These managers are in charge of tasks such as performance reviews, compensation adjustments, training and development plans, and so on. They are not accountable for their direct reports’ (DRs’) day-to-day actions, but they do use performance feedback from the relevant functional managers to make key decisions. They are also known as personnel managers, and the reporting line between a manager and a DR is not frequently changed. In a matrix organization, an employee can likewise serve as both a functional manager and a line manager.
How To Implement Matrix Management Structure
Consider the following steps to correctly deploy a matrix management structure in your workplace:
#1. Determine who employees will report to.
Gathering a list of all personnel and current projects is the first stage in implementing a matrix management system in the company. Once you’ve determined which talents are required for a certain project, allocate individual employees or teams to those projects and identify to whom they report.
This can assist employees identify their superiors and promote more efficient communication. This also keeps you and your personnel organized and operations running smoothly.
#2. Maintain clear communication
It’s critical for managers to check in with their personnel. See if there is anything you can do for them or any questions you can answer.
Maintaining good communication and being an active listener will demonstrate to your staff that you care and are dependable. Contact them on a frequent basis, particularly when problems emerge.
Maintain an open line of contact with your various managers if you are an employee. It is critical to keep them informed of any issues as well as the status of your project. It is also critical to appreciate the thoughts of your team members.
Even if you disagree with them, be an attentive listener and receptive to what they have to say. Good relationships with your management, as well as your team members, can help the project progress more quickly.
#3. Take note of what works and what doesn’t.
Pay close attention to the success and problems of each project. This can include if everyone communicates successfully, whether team members can use a certain ability in a new way, or whether the project would benefit from less management.
Take note of what doesn’t work so you can prevent similar situations in the future. Similarly, remember what makes the team successful and apply that information to the next project.
Benefits of a Matrix Management Structure
Although the matrix management structure is more complex than the hierarchical structure, it has numerous advantages. The matrix design has several advantages, including clear project objectives, effective resource usage, free-flowing information, and training for project managers.
#1. Specify project goals
The matrix organizational design might help to clarify project objectives. When your team reports their progress to both the project manager and the department head, it is vital to establish project goals. Project organization becomes a priority when the project manager feels supported by other members of senior management.
Assume your team is working on an app development project. Because you have a matrix structure, the IT developers report to you as the project manager and the director of the IT department. The project goal is to develop mobile keyword search software for marketers. The app is produced faster when the IT department head and project manager communicate a clear project objective to the IT developers.
#2. Resource utilization that is efficient
Because teams contain professionals from many departments, the matrix structure provides for the most efficient use of resources. This decreases overhead costs as well as the time required to accomplish a job. There are fewer managers per team in a hierarchical structure where each team reports to only one manager. Because they lack personnel with diverse specialties, these teams may take longer to complete a single project deliverable.
Scenario: The team developing the keyword research app may include specialists from the IT, finance, and marketing departments. When these team members successfully report to their department heads and project managers, they boost team productivity, save time, and complete the project more quickly.
The matrix team saves money since corporations would have to rearrange teams and maybe hire new team members every time a new product or service is developed without a combined group of specialists.
#3. Free Flow of Information
Working in a matrix structure allows information to flow freely across teams because each team reports to many leaders. In a hierarchical structure, team members must remember to relay information, but the matrix requires information flow. Reporting information to several leaders may appear time-consuming, but with the correct project management system in place, team members are required to do little or no more work.
Scenario: If the keyword research app’s development team simply reported to the project manager, information about a bug patch could be lost. However, when it’s part of the matrix process, transmitting information to the IT department head is simple.
#4. Project management education
The matrix organization’s distinct structure allows project managers a great deal of authority. Project managers are responsible for guiding their teams through the project lifecycle. This structure tests project managers and prepares them to become cross-functional managers in other areas.
Scenario: Your team meets several bug fixes and a delay in the project timetable while working on this project. It is your obligation as the project manager to collaborate with the IT department head to successfully resolve all concerns. As a result, you discover a personal passion for IT—as well as a potential future professional opportunity.
#5. Team Retention
Because specialists are positioned together, the product team remains strong in the matrix organization. These team members are assigned to project managers after working under functional department heads. Working with specialists is typically enjoyable, and it can boost project performance.
Scenario: During the keyword research app project, the project team is made up of numerous IT, marketing, and finance specialists who understand the intricacies of developing an app for phone users. This group of specialists will most likely continue to collaborate on numerous projects in the future.
Drawbacks of the Matrix Organizational Structure
The matrix organization, like the hierarchical reporting structure, has drawbacks. The majority of the downsides originate from the complexity of this structure. While intricate designs can be beneficial when they function, they can also cause disagreement and make things more complicated.
#1. Complex style of reporting
The matrix organization’s complexity might be negative because teams may have difficulty determining who to report to and when. While the matrix’s goal is to aid teams, it has the potential to complicate projects and confuse the whole process.
Solution: The best method to avoid a reporting failure is to ensure that every member of the matrix understands who and how to report to. The matrix structure can be simplified by using intuitive project management software that supports cross-team collaboration.
#2. Slow Response Time
The matrix’s intricacy can cause delayed response times, which can cause project delays. The necessity to report information to several persons causes slow reaction times. Having more individuals participating is a positive thing, but it takes time to communicate information to additional people.
Solution: Using a project management system will fix the problem of the matrix structure’s poor response times. As a single source of truth, Asana can reduce duplication of effort and boost visibility among teams and leaders.
#3. Conflicting Ideas
When the project manager and department head are not on the same page, conflicting guidance occurs. While the matrix structure is intended to promote teamwork, depending on the personalities involved, it may have the opposite effect.
To avoid contradicting guidance, implement a mechanism that allows managers to connect directly with one another. Managers who are aligned on project goals and stay on the same page can keep team members from feeling caught in the middle.
#4. Potential conflict
The major distinction between a matrix and a hierarchical structure is that team members in a matrix structure report to two managers. This complicates the matrix organization and places greater responsibilities on team members. Having two managers might provide more feedback and assistance to team members, but it can also cause conflict.
Solution: It is critical for the department head and the project manager to communicate in order to avoid potential conflict. When there is a conflict between managers, it should not be the team’s responsibility to pick between them. Managers can avoid conflict by establishing clear project objectives from the start and working together to generate a successful result, whether in person or through virtual platforms.
#5. Managing Priorities
If supervisors do not collaborate, it might be challenging for team members to juggle priorities in a matrix structure. If the department head believes their tasks are the most important and the project manager agrees, the team may struggle to decide which manager’s advice to prioritize.
When team members have difficulty prioritizing tasks due to miscommunication among supervisors, it is up to the managers to discuss the team’s tasks and choose what should be done first. Most challenges that may develop as a result of the matrix structure may be resolved with good team participation, communication, and clarity.
Skills Required To Become an Effective MatrixLeader
A project manager or line manager guides the team to success. As a result, they must develop soft skills to ensure the team’s smooth operation.
The following are some of the most notable:
#1. Dispute resolution
When personnel from different departments collaborate on a project, they bring multiple perspectives to the table, which frequently leads to disagreements and discrepancies. To resolve these differences and sustain team harmony, every manager must grasp practical conflict resolution skills.
#2. Communication and Collaboration
A project or functional manager is responsible for communicating roles and duties to all team members while maintaining transparency. As a result, they must have strong communication abilities. Furthermore, a matrix structure necessitates the seamless interchange of knowledge, files, and so on between departments, making collaboration an essential skill set for managers.
#3. Analytical abilities that have been refined
A project manager and a resource manager in a matrix organization may encounter a variety of difficulties that may impact a project. Uneven workload distribution, disengagement, decreased productivity, chargeable losses, schedule/budget overruns, and so on are some of them. Managers must improve their analytical skills in order to make educated judgments, build the best-fit project and resource plan, and deal with such issues.
#4. Influential status
Good persuasive ability is required to get everyone on the same page, see the big picture, and urge everyone to strive toward a common objective.
To urge others to follow suit, an effective manager must lead by example and demonstrate good ethics.
#5. Problem-solving skill
A problem-solving mindset is essential for staying on top of challenges and resolving them more quickly and efficiently. As a result, every functional and line manager must have a positive mindset as well as a problem-solving strategy.
Conclusion
A matrix organization is a hierarchical organizational model that has proven to be effective in terms of productivity and organization in the workplace. However, arranging the organization per project is not the secret to success. The corresponding management strategy is equally significant. To reap the true benefits of these sorts of organizational structures in the long run, it is critical to guarantee that managers understand how to communicate, manage their emotions, and make future decisions in the best interests of the company. Agile project management, as well as other initiatives such as diversity management and frugal innovation, are thus strongly advised.
- DECISION MATRIX: Meaning, Use, and Guide
- BCG MATRIX: Definition, Application, and Importance
- Ansoff Matrix Explained: Practical Examples, Theory, & Strategy
- HOW TO BECOME A BUSINESS ANALYST: How to Become a Business Analyst With No Experience(2023 Guide)
- Project Quality Management Planning Guide (Tools & Software)
References
