Centralization is an organizational structure in which the power and authority to make decisions lies solely on the top management officials, while the lower-level individuals/subordinates are obligated to implement such decisions regardless of what they think. I may have exaggerated this a bit and made it sound unfair to the lower level, but you’re going to find out for yourself when you read further.
This article also talks about the difference between centralization and decentralization management.
What Does Centralization Mean?
Centralization is a form of organizational structure that is also known as consolidation. In this structure, all decisions are made by either a single leader or a small number of people. It is the contradiction of decentralization and it refers to a management structure in which power to make decisions is distributed across higher and lower levels of management.
The practice of centralization (as well as decentralization) is applicable to a diverse range of organizations, such as private companies as well as national and local governments. As a firm expands, its operations become too extensive for a single leader to handle adequately. As a result, many organizations transition away from centralized leadership and evolve into a decentralized model. Centralizing power is frequent among small businesses and startups.
Let’s consider both the benefits and drawbacks of centralization
Read also: DECENTRALIZED ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE: Meaning And Advantages
Benefits of Centralization in Organizations
There are several important benefits that come with the centralization of power in an organization.
#1. Clear vision
When an organization has a centralized management structure, it can easily focus on achieving its vision. There are open channels of communication, and the senior executive may express the organization’s vision to employees and assist them toward its fulfillment.
Because there are no clear lines of authority in the absence of centralized management, there will be discrepancies in communicating with staff. The top-down direction of the organization’s vision enables the smooth implementation of its visions and strategies. Customers, suppliers, and communities are also sent a consistent message by the organization.
#2. Reduced expenses
A centralized organization follows standard rules and practices that lead the organization, lowering office and administrative expenditures. Because the major decision-makers are headquartered at the company’s head office or headquarters, there is no need to deploy additional departments or equipment to other branches.
Furthermore, because crucial decisions are made at the headquarters and disseminated to the branches, the business does not need to pay additional resources to engage specialists for its branches. The clear line of command avoids the possibility of duplication of responsibilities, which could result in increased expenditures to the business.
#3. Improved work quality
A centralized organization’s established procedures and greater oversight result in higher work quality. Each department has a supervisor who ensures that the output is consistent and of good quality.
The utilization of modern machinery saves potential waste from manual labor while still ensuring high-quality results. Work standardization also lowers the replication of tasks, which might result in excessive labor expenses.
#4. A clear chain of command
A clear chain of command assists a centralized organization since everyone in the organization knows who to report to. When junior employees have problems with the organization, they know who to contact.
Senior executives, on the other hand, have a defined plan for allocating authority to staff who excel in specific roles. The leaders also gain assurance that there would be no overlap in responsibilities when they assign them to mid-level managers and other staff. When a company wants to execute decisions promptly, a clear chain of command is advantageous.
#5. Decisions take effect as soon as possible.
Decisions in a centralized organization are made by a small group of people and relayed to lower-level supervisors. Because they may talk about the nuances of each decision in one meeting, the involvement of only a few people makes the decision-making process more efficient.
The decisions are subsequently relayed to the organization’s lowest levels for implementation. When lower-level managers are involved in decision-making, the process takes longer and disagreements occur. Because certain managers may protest the decisions if their input gets overlooked, the implementation process will be lengthy and complicated.
Setbacks of Centralization
There are a few significant drawbacks associated with the centralization of power inside an organization.
#1. Employee dissatisfaction
Employees become loyal to an organization when they are given the opportunity to take personal initiative in their work. They can express their ingenuity and suggest new approaches to complete specific jobs. However, there is little initiative in work when it is centralized because people fulfill tasks that are conceptualized by top executives. Because of the rigidity of the work, this inhibits their inventiveness and devotion to the firm.
#2. Work delays
Because records are sent to and from the main office, centralization causes work delays. Employees rely on information conveyed from the top, and any delays in conveying the records will result in a loss of man-hours. Employees will be less productive if they have to wait for long periods of time for instructions on their next initiatives.
#3. Regulatory leadership
Centralized management is similar to authoritarian leadership in that staff are only required to provide results that the senior executives assign them. Employees are unable to contribute to the organization’s decision-making process and are only implementers of decisions taken at a higher level.
When employees have difficulty implementing some decisions, CEOs will not comprehend because they are only decision-makers and not decision-implementers. As a result of such activities, performance suffers because employees lack the motivation to adopt decisions made by top-level managers without the involvement of lower-level employees.
What is Centralization Management?
Centralization management is the process by which only the executives of a company are in charge of planning and decision-making. These top management officials provide guidance to all other levels of management within the organization, who assist in putting the decision into action. Executives are masters in critical thinking and planning, allowing them to set an organization’s goals and lead activities in accordance with these goals.
Features of Centralization Management
The following features make up centralized management:
#1. Clearly defined system
Centralized management creates a robust organizational system. Employees within the organization can learn new information more efficiently by adopting a uniform information-sharing strategy for all leaders to follow, allowing them to spend the time they need to remain productive. There is also a clear line of command, which assists employees in finding instructions or reporting difficulties to higher-level employees and supervisors.
#2. Existence of senior management
Senior management is an essential component of any organization. These are experts who operate at the company’s executive levels, such as the chief financial officer. Senior management’s major responsibilities include making critical company choices and developing business strategies. In a centralized organization, the senior management is also in charge of handling employee complaints and resolving issues.
#3. Best for startups
Centralization management works best for small businesses and startups due to the decision-making process. It can also operate in large organizations, but the decision-making process may be slower and less effective as more individuals are involved. In small businesses, senior management can make a decision and communicate it to employees at each level of the organization. Communication is likely to be easier with fewer people, which is a good match for the top-down strategy.
Skills Required for Centralization Management Officials
To be effective in a centralized organization, top management professionals need to have the following skills:
#1. Problem-solving skills
The ability to assess an issue, generate options, and select the best resolution is critical for individuals in management, particularly those in centralized management. This is because they make decisions that affect the entire business. Executives evaluate alternatives and make decisions based on the company’s values and mission statement. As a result of the easier procedure, these executives may be able to reach company goals more quickly.
#2. Strong listening skills
In a business with a vertical communication flow, strong listening skills are necessary. This indicates that the organization’s top-level communicates instructions and information to employees who relay the message from one level to the next. Even while executives share information and make choices, employees at all levels must be considered because decisions affect them. One method is to listen to employees’ issues and ask for input, which can make them feel important. This feedback has the potential to improve their working environment.
#3. Analytical skill
Executives use analysis to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions, strategies, and procedures they develop. Being analytical also implies that these individuals may provide constructive feedback to themselves, which leads to progress, as they may be more likely to assess their own and others’ work.
#4. Critical thinking skill
The ability to observe, collect, and understand facts in order to draw conclusions is a critical thinking skill. This is critical for decision-making, assisting senior management in making well-informed decisions. Critical thinking also allows you to be impartial, which means you may make decisions that benefit many people rather than biased decisions that may be self-serving.
Distinction Between Centralization and Decentralization Management
Both centralization and decentralization are forms of structures that can be found in several parts of an organization, including management, government, and even purchasing. Centralization of leadership means that the authority for making and executing decisions rests solely with the top management of the organization.
Decentralization, on the hand, refers to the distribution of authorities from the highest level of management to those at the middle or lower levels of management. At each and every level of management, it is the act of delegating authority to subordinates.
It is possible to evaluate whether or not an organization is centralized or decentralized by examining the location of decision-making authority as well as the extent to which lower levels have decision-making power. These two terms are always being compared in an effort to demonstrate that one of them is superior to the other.
To further buttress centralization management, let us look at its distinction between decentralization management.
#1. Size of the Organization
Because there are fewer employees for management to make choices for and oversee, a centralized management structure may be appropriate for small firms. This is because executives in a smaller organization are more likely to have first-hand knowledge of what people are working on and their specific goals than executives in a larger organization.
When making decisions that touch a large number of individuals, it may be best to delegate decision-making authority to those who understand how the outcomes may affect personnel. Because they can closely see the impacts, several decision-makers can represent employees at various levels and make educated judgments. Decentralized management is frequently effective in large enterprises.
#2. Decision-making
The primary distinction between centralization and decentralization management is the decision-making process. In the former, one body of management decides on procedures and develops plans for business operations, while in the latter, management makes decisions for their departments and teams at every level.
#3. Obligation/Responsibility
Under centralization management, a small group of executives has total responsibility, but under decentralization, managers and employees share responsibility.
#4. Communication
In centralized management, senior management provides information and directives, and all employees must obey the executives’ instructions. Decentralized administration, on the other hand, allows departments to speak more freely with one another. It is not rare for mid-level managers to initiate goals rather than executives. This is due to duty-sharing and decision-making responsibilities.
In simple terms, What is Decentralization?
Decentralization is a type of organizational structure in which top management delegates decision-making and day-to-day operations to subordinates and lower employees.
What are the Types of Centralization in Management?
Centralization can take on a few different forms, the most common of which are departmental centralization, centralization of performance, and centralization of management.
What is a Good Example of Centralization Management?
Apple is an excellent illustration of a company that has a management structure that is centralized. After Steve Jobs’s passing, Apple’s CEO Tim Cook stepped into the role of company leader and has since been responsible for making many important decisions. Steve Jobs was Apple’s founder and former CEO.
What is the Goal of Centralization?
Centralization enables top management to develop a comprehensive perspective of operations while maintaining strict financial controls.
What are the Factors of Centralization?
- Efficiency of the employees
- Ability to delegate work.
- Uniformity of action.
- Facilitation of integration.
- Management of emergencies.
- Nature of the organization.
- Size of the organization.
- Nature of the work.
Final Words
Centralization may seem unfair, but it’s not. Decentralization, on the other hand, may seem fair because it allows for the opinions of lower-level individuals and makes them feel a sense of worth. But at the end of the day, the goal should always be to get the job done and keep the business flourishing, using either a centralized or decentralized organizational structure.
Let us know what you think.
Related Posts
- ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: Definition, Types and Ultimate Guide
- WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENT? Types and Examples
- Maximizing Your Networking Strategy With Digital Business Cards: The Ultimate Guide
- Different Types of Discrimination in the Workplace
- Internal Conflict in Workplace: Causes & How to Resolve Them
References
