{"id":102510,"date":"2023-02-28T11:11:37","date_gmt":"2023-02-28T11:11:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businessyield.com\/?p=102510"},"modified":"2023-05-02T14:01:25","modified_gmt":"2023-05-02T14:01:25","slug":"mercantilism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businessyield.com\/information\/mercantilism\/","title":{"rendered":"MERCANTILISM: Theory, Benefit & Difference","gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"text"}]},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A lot of the time, the government used the economy to strengthen state power at the expense of other countries. This process is known as mercantilism. Governments wanted to build up their riches in the form of bullion and make sure that exports outpaced imports. Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, mercantilism was a trade-based economic system. Continue reading for an overview of mercantilism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mercantilism <\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A type of economic nationalism called mercantilism aimed to strengthen a country’s position of strength and prosperity by enforcing unfair trade laws. Its objective was to use exports to increase a state’s gold and silver supply as opposed to using imports to reduce it. Together with it, it aimed to promote domestic employment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The mercantilism theory said that because the world’s wealth was fixed, governments had to limit trade in order to get richer and have more power. Manufacturers and merchants, like the English and Dutch East India Companies, were the main people that mercantilism cared about when it came to protecting their businesses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Characteristics of Mercantilism.<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

These are the major characteristics of mercantilism<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#1. Affirming That Wealth is Static<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Because precious metals were so rare, people had a narrow view of what it meant to be wealthy. If a country wanted to be wealthy and powerful, it had to hurt other countries to get as rich as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#2. The Requirement to Boost Gold Production<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Richness and power were symbolized by gold. Armed forces, resource-seeking maritime expeditions, and rising empires may all be funded by it. Invasion defense is another possibility. A nation’s demise was attributed to a lack of gold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#3. The Want to Keep a Trade Surplus<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

A wealth-building strategy required this. Instead of focusing more on importing goods, nations needed to concentrate on selling their exports and generating the related money (and sending gold out of countries).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#4. A Big Population Is Important<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Wealth was reflected in the large populations. In order to provide a labor force, support domestic trade, and keep armies in place, a country’s population must grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#5. How Wealth is Supported by Colonies<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

For raw materials, labor, and a means of maintaining control over their wealth, certain countries needed colonies (by selling the colonies the products their raw materials helped to produce). Colonies essentially strengthened a nation’s capacity to create riches and ensure national security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#6. Usage of Protectionism<\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Colonies weren’t allowed to trade with other countries, and tariffs were put on imports to keep a country’s ability to make and keep trade surpluses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

History of Mercantilism<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In the 1500s, mercantilism first appeared in Europe. It was based on the idea that a country’s wealth and power would be best served by increasing exports and decreasing imports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Western Europe’s feudal economic structure was supplanted by mercantilism. Despite being the hub of the British Empire at the time, England had very few natural resources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In order to get richer, England set up fiscal policies that made it easier for colonists to buy only British goods and harder for them to buy goods from other countries. For instance, the Sugar Act of 1764 increased taxes on molasses and refined sugar brought into the colonies from abroad. The British sugar plantations in the West Indies wanted to control the colonial market so they raised taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a similar vein, the Navigation Act of 1651 prohibited foreign ships from trading along the British coast and mandated that colonial products first go under British control before being divided throughout Europe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These kinds of initiatives led to a favorable trade balance, which raised Great Britain’s national income.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under mercantilism, countries often used their military power to protect their own markets and supply chains. According to mercantilists, a country’s possession of valuable metals like gold or silver can be used to gauge the strength of its economy. Their numbers tended to go up when there were more new homes being built, more crops being grown, and a strong merchant fleet that sent goods and raw materials to more markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ideology of Mercantilism<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Mercantilism is an economic theory that says the government should control trade with other countries and protect businesses at home. Mercantilist policies prioritize trade surpluses and the protection of domestic businesses through laws. When it comes to international trade, government rules like tariffs and import restrictions are used to create a good trade balance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the home front, mercantilist policies help domestic industries by making monopolies and sharing resources to help them grow. These measures are a sort of economic protectionism designed to promote self-sufficiency and are in stark contrast to the free-market economics of trade and globalization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Criticisms of Mercantilism<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The main idea behind mercantilism is that getting gold and other valuable metals is the best way to get rich. Nowadays, we believe that a country’s GDP, or economic output, is what determines how wealthy it is. This is so because of the inability to measure real wealth by how much gold a country owns but by what its labor and land are creating. Mercantilists, meanwhile, favor independence and forbid importation. But, as happened in Spain, some countries are unable to produce enough food to sustain their own populations. Despite having a lot of gold, the bulk of its inhabitants were starving.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If a country can’t meet its own basic needs, it can’t be thought of as wealthy. The state-granted monopolies also discouraged domestic companies from competing. By putting high tariffs and limits on imports, domestic businesses are mostly protected from competition. Because of these pressures, businesses would try to make their factories more efficient so they could make goods for less money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The attack on imports was on the idea that wealth can’t grow. So, one country’s loss is another’s gain. The assumption is incorrect, though. Adam Smith outlined the cause in his book “A Wealth of Nations.” In this book, Smith defines “comparative advantage” as when one country is better at making Product A than another, but the other country is better at making Product A. Focusing on the goods that each country is best at producing will increase both countries’ output and, hence, their income.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mercantilism Involves.<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n